29 Dec 20253 min read

2025 Highlights — Top 7 Features, Events, and User Feedback

Explyt TeamPublished 29 Dec 2025

2025 was an incredible year for Explyt – filled with new features, hands-on experiences, geographic expansion, and, of course, a few challenges along the way. None of this would have been possible without the support, feedback, and enthusiasm of our community. Thank you for being part of the journey.

We’re kicking off this New Year Digest with the Top 7 Explyt features, selected by you

1 - Test generation from execution
2 - Explyt Agent
3 - Workflows
4 - Rules
5 - Flaky tests detection
6 - Increase Test Coverage
7 - Fixing autotest from TMS

Your ideas, use cases, and honest feedback continue to shape Explyt and help us focus on what truly matters.

Explyt in 2025

  • delivered 4 major releases, along with numerous EAP and nightly builds
  • supported PyCharm, Rider, GoLand, PhpStorm, and WebStorm
  • officially listed on the JetBrains marketplace
  • participated in AIE 2025 (China)
  • spoke at SOAP, a workshop co-located with the ACM SIGPLAN PLDI conference (South Korea)
  • hosted multiple meetups and webinars
  • launched Explyt blogs on Medium, LinkedIn, Facebook, and X

Thank you for 2025 – Happy New Year!

Thank you for sharing your knowledge, experience, and trust with Explyt. Every conversation, bug report, feature request, and success story helps us grow and build a better product together.

As we step into 2026, we wish you inspiration, stability, and success in all your projects. We’re already hard at work on the next generation of Explyt releases and can’t wait to share what’s coming next.

Here’s to another year of learning, building, and improving — together.

Newsletter

Get Explyt updates in your inbox

Release notes, engineering deep dives, and new articles like this one. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Comments

Loading comments...

Keep reading

All articles

Why choose Explyt?

Feature

Debugger

Yes

Ultimate only

No

No

No

No

SAST vulnerability scanner

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

IDE refactorings (Rename, Change Signature…)

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Test coverage guarantees

Yes

Coverage gates

No

No

No

No

No

Semantic code model (types, find-usages)

Yes

Full code model

Yes

LSP

No

LSP

No

Reads dependency source

Yes

No

LSP

No

No

No

Auto-review of generated code

Yes

Via verify

/review

PR only

No

No

Context compression

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

Multi-IDE support

JB only

JB only

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pricing (all top models)

$15-200/mo

Credit-based

$20–200/mo

$20–60/mo

$10–39/mo

BYOK

What IDE-native AI feels like

What impressed me most is how well the agent understands the existing project. Its plans fit naturally into what is already built, even when I am working outside my usual tech stack.

Mariya Remenyuk
Mariya Remenyuk

Senior Analyst Developer · DXC Technology

LSP gives an agent coordinates; the full IDE gives it the project model. That native IDE context makes all the difference on real Java code.

Akiner Alkan
Akiner Alkan

Software Architect & AI Board Lead · Siemens

IDE-native stepping makes the difference on stateful Java applications.

Masaood
Masaood

Software Engineer

Webinar: Working with AI Tools at the User Level

Methodology, SDD + TDD, feedback loops, and subagents — a practical framework for getting predictable results from AI coding agents. For senior Java developers and team leads using JetBrains IDEs.

Explyt 5.20

Explyt 5.20: stop waiting in the chat — a background task panel and notifications outside the IDE

Frequently Asked Questions

Getting Started

IDE Integration & Workflow

How Explyt Compares

Models & BYOK

Pricing & Billing

Privacy & Security